Regional Water Quality Control
Board
Comments on Proposed Vista Grande Canal Demonstration
Regional Board staff have reviewed San Francisco Public Utilities
Commission (SFPUCs) and North San Mateo County Sanitation District
(NSMCSDs) proposed Water Quality Preliminary Screening Plan (Plan) for
Lake Merced.
The stormwater discharge from Vista Grande Canal to Lake Merced is
proposed to be performed on a controlled only pilot basis. The subject
discharge of stormwater is currently regulated under the MS4 NPDES
municipal stormwater permit.
We appreciate SFPUCs and NSMCSDs partnership efforts towards improving
the water quality at Lake Merced. However, we find the current Plan
deficient in several key areas necessary to adequately characterize and
safeguard water quality threats associated with the proposed Plan and
discharge of stormwater from the Vista Grande Canal. We have the
following comments and recommendations relative to the Plan that we
request be addressed before any discharge occurs from the Vista Grande
Canal to Lake Merced.
1) The proposed Plan appears to be generally directed at the human
health threats of coliform and does not adequately address other
priority stormwater pollutants of concern appropriate in a baseline
study of this nature. Along with the proposed sampling analysis
parameters, the following additional priority stormwater pollutants of
concern should be included in the Plan: Petroleum hydrocarbons
(normally EPA 8015 and/or 8020), 17 priority metals (CAM 17); Fecal
coliform; and a limited screening for candidate pesticides/herbicides.
Lastly, we strongly recommend use of ammonia and nitrate field kits
which can indicate high coliform levels and provide immediate results.
2) The proposed Plan does not have adequate sampling station locations
to monitor the priority stormwater pollutants of concern appropriate in
a baseline study of this nature. At a minimum, monitoring locations
should be located: a) Before entering the Continuous Deflection System
(CDS) unit; b) After leaving the CDS unit; c) In Soil and water samples
in the wetland treatment area; d) LM-1; e) LM-2; f) LM-3 and, g) LM-PR.
Sampling should also be performed at different lake water levels, not
just at the surface, to evaluate pollutant stratification in the Lake
water. Board staff feel that the additional monitoring locations are
important in gathering appropriate and meaningful information about the
overall fate and transport of stormwater pollutants in the Lake.
Additionally, Regional Board staff strongly support the use of dye test
studies to calibrate detention times and identify optimum sampling
locations, however we find insufficient details in the Plan. Please
discuss the proposed dye test in a more detailed and strategic manner
(dye type, application rates/locations, sampling, etc.).
3) During sampling, visual observations should also be noted for
changes in appropriate wildlife conditions (particularly the number and
type of flora and fauna) and other general conditions (e.g., weather,
floating trash, water levels, recreational use, etc.). In addition, it
would be an opportunity to conduct and maintain a photographic history
of changes in key areas of the Lake.
4) The Plan does not contain adequate information regarding the Vista
Grande Stormwater diversion volume flow rate limits and associated
safeguards to cease and desist a diversion, should environmental or
human health water quality threats occur. For example, should
significant surface runnoff occur over the wetland treatment area, or,
if high pollutant concentrations are found in the Lake, there should be
a clear strategy and associated proceedures so that the stormwater
diversion discharge will be immediately shut off.
Please describe this section in more detail and include an evaluation
of the wetland areas bio-retention capacity and effectiveness. This
evaluation should describe flow attenuation as well as pollutant
removal. Specific flow rate limits should also be discussed and
appropriate adaptive management safeguards that will be in place to
prevent water quality threats. The Plan should clearly describe what
would be considered an environmental or human health threat (i.e.,
coliform exceeds DHS limits, or other parameters exceed Basin Plan
limits, etc.).
Lastly, we request additional efforts by Daly City and the San Mateo
County Stormwater Program to further investigate priority stormwater
pollutant source areas and to minimize runoff to the Vista Grande Canal
to the maximum extent practicable. Please feel free to contact me
directly at (510) 622-2438 to further discuss this matter or if any
clarification of these comments are needed.
December 18, 2003
John West
Stormwater Project Manager
Regional Water Quality Control Board
San Francisco Region